On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> > Yeah, same here. It's pretty obvious that RC1 isn't likely to get much
> > more testing -- these things happen in bursts, and (as Paul noted elsewhere
> > in his mail) RC1 isn't even publicly released yet. Most of the developer
> > testing done to sign a release involves strict use of the test suite. This
> > burst of additional issues at all was the result of adhoc testing. So, if
> > the goal is ride the statistical wave of find-rates today, we need to
> > actually get the code into more people's hands. And to do that requires
> > actually releasing something. It ain't RC1 though, because we now know
> > without a doubt that that snapshot is *not* a potential candidate for
> > release.
> >
> > +1 on an RC2, shooting for, perhaps, Monday morning, first thing?
>
> If you mean have it signed and released to the public for then, +1.
>
> Otherwise, is there a specific reason to wait until then? Perhaps
> there is some fix activity going on that I am just not aware of.
I would like to nominate (probably requiring a backport branch, once I
get into work) the back-compat tests I fixed yesterday, so that people
can use them as a part of their testing. (And the stuff in STATUS
now, of course.)
--dave
--
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-10 16:38:16 CEST