[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.5.0-rc1 up for signing/testing

From: David Glasser <glasser_at_davidglasser.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 07:38:17 -0700

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Peter Samuelson <peter_at_p12n.org> wrote:
>
> [Mark Phippard]
>
> > We talked about this last year and decided we were going to update to
> > the latest APR. I do not see any reason to change that decision.
>
> That is a fundamental policy change, then. In the past you have
> committed to binary compatibility for the Subversion library API until
> 2.0. Now you are breaking it, at least for those who use the deps
> tarball - which to me represents an official endorsement.
>
> I'm also disappointed because last time a related issue came up - I
> advocated allowing libsvn-with-apr-0.9 and libsvn-with-apr-1.x to be
> installed in parallel (so apps would automatically use whichever one
> they were compiled with) - my idea was shot down specifically because
> it would not honor the promise of binary compatibility until 2.0. Now
> your situation will be even worse: not only will libsvn be
> binary-incompatible, but third-party apps will _need_ to be recompiled
> or they will crash. Maybe I'm weird, but I'd much rather have an app
> use an older version of libsvn (or complain at startup that you deleted
> that older version) than try to use the latest libsvn and then
> misbehave or crash randomly at runtime.
>
> Justin in particular was pretty vocal in his belief that my proposal
> would break promises to the users. I hope he opposes this change at
> least as strenuously, for the same reason.

I was always under the impression that the deps tarball was a way of
not scaring off people from installing Subversion back when it was a
brand new system nobody had ever heard of with a surprising number of
dependencies. Now that Subversion is dominant enough that no
self-respecting system makes it hard to get svn up and running (and
even major consumer operating systems ship with svn by default), the
deps tarball seems like a nice gesture, but hardly a source of
compatibility worries.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-08 16:38:29 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.