Re: 1.5.0-rc1 up for signing/testing

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:53 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>>> Is serf still considered "experimental"? If so, should we 1) be testing
>> it, and 2) block on test failures in ra_serf?
>> Yes, 1) yes, and 2) perhaps not, but there's not much point in being
>> experimental if all the experiments fail. :-)
>
> I thought he said one test, update_tests.py number 41 failed. Not 41
> tests failed.
>
>

Yes *only* one test 'update_tests-41' failed over ra_serf(on both FS layer)

With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH+3pn3WHvyO0YTCwRAt/dAJwMGgMf2nJOjEr6iWoYgl/JpxvlvwCfVUag
sh5fQQ4JTqj9LIomHQ0rFZA=
=CnbA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-08 16:00:48 CEST