[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: serf in -deps tarballs

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:40:14 -0400

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo_at_mobsol.be> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> > svnlgo_at_mobsol.be wrote:
> > > AFAIC we should. The latest serf tarball can be found here:
> > > http://code.google.com/p/serf/downloads/list
> > >
> >
> > Okay. Should we include it for Windows and *nix?
> >
> Serf supports both and building subversion with serf on windows is not
> harder than without, so please do.

Building Subversion with serf on Windows is actually very easy. On
Windows our build process will build serf for you as part of the
normal build process. So I agree we ought to include it for Windows
if we decide to include it in deps.

I seem to recall that cmpilato was against including Serf in our deps
tarball until the ra_serf layer respected our Editor API. To put
words in his mouth, I imagine he would view including Serf in the deps
tarball as elevating it from "experimental" to "official" and if it is
official it needs to follow the API rules.

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-02 18:40:27 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.