Re: [PATCH] XFail test to prove issue #3146
From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:38:02 +0200
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 05:32:31PM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
Hey Senthil,
> I am attaching a patch along with this email which is an XFail test to
Thanks, this is great :)
> I ve tried my best to guess the expected status/output/etc :)
Note that tree conflicts are marked on the containing directory of
The tree conflict victim is alpha-moved in your test, because
To indicate tree conflicts, we use the first column ('C ') in the
So the expected output should be something like:
expected_output = svntest.wc.State(short_branch_path, {
And the expected status should be something like:
expected_status = wc.State(short_branch_path, {
The way you wrote the expected output and status in the test means
I plan to finally start working on a fix for this issue today.
Please feel free to commit this test to the tree-conflicts branch
Thanks,
[1] Unfortunately, this use case is not yet described anywhere
-- Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> Software Developer elego Software Solutions GmbH HRB 77719 Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, Gebaeude 12 Tel: +49 30 23 45 86 96 13355 Berlin Fax: +49 30 23 45 86 95 http://www.elego.de Geschaeftsfuehrer: Olaf Wagner
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.