Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> writes:
> My point was that if we define something really really simple then we
> stand a fair chance of being able to implement it now in a reasonable
> amount of effort with a result that's useful and a foundation for
> further expansion. If instead we choose to implement the various
> flavours of log-like output now, then I predict we will spend an
> inordinate amount of effort getting it to an acceptable standard. For
> example, I mentioned that if we provide the "log -v" output of all
> changed paths per source revision, we will likely find that this is
> misleading to the point of being a bug when we apply it to revisions
> that were only partially merged. These sort of issues (which can
> individually be seen as "corner cases") quickly multiply up.
>
> Therefore let's define something that we stand a chance of being able
> to complete correctly now, and consider making it more friendly later.
Like a bare revision number per line?
(Hint, hint... :-) )
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-28 20:56:50 CET