Re: 'svn resolved' (past tense) actually performs resolution now?
From: Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:16:24 -0700
"Mark Phippard" <markphip_at_gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:17 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrot
Well, I think Mark and David raised an important point:
> Adding a new subcommand, especially one that varies by a single
That confusion worries me. Hm, how about:
- move the --accept option to a new 'resolve' command (which in
> confused. Why not just add a new option like --accept=current or
It sounds like you're looking for --accept=merged?
> I am commenting because I really like the new feature, and like the
How we implement the command-line UI does not impact how you or
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.