Karl Fogel wrote:
> "Mark Phippard" <markphip_at_gmail.com> writes:
>> I also saw some discussion last week about improving the format of the
>> mergeinfo output before release. Is that still an open issue or did
>> it get committed? When Dan and I were originally making proposals
>> around this command we envisioned it having output that was similar to
>> svn log. At the time, that was the main hold-up for us in
>> implementing it as we could not decide if it should be a new
>> subcommand or an option to log. I liked the proposals for the command
>> line UI I saw last week, but would still like to see log style output.
>> In the graphical merge client we have built, I use the API to show
>> the revisions eligible to be merged and I do it in a log style format.
>> It is extremely useful, especially when deciding what revisions ought
>> to potentially be backported.
>
> I think that discussion is still going on, but all the contenders have
> been implemented (as far as I know), so it's just a question about
> choosing what we want the output to look like.
Some of the contenders are sorta-kinda implemented (but none of them have
been committed). I'm gonna fire off a feature branch in a few minutes so I
can *not* be the only person holding these changes.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2008-03-25 18:19:35 CET