Re: svn log -g doesn't include mergeinfo from child entries

>> I'm asking because my last experiments with log -g (from October 2007)
>> brought complete mergeinfo here when logging the repository root (and
>> I couldn't find a thread on changing this). I'm using Alpha 2 from
>> March, 3rd.
>
> Is this still a problem in beta1?

Yes, the same behavior. Is it supposed to work? In this case I might
upload the repository somewhere so you can have a look at it.

--
Best regards,
Marc Strapetz
_____________
SyntEvo GmbH
www.syntevo.com
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Marc Strapetz wrote:
>> Current log -g only outputs "Merged via" information if the 
>> corresponding mergeinfo is present at the logged entry itself. 
>> mergeinfo from child entries is not included. Is that intended?
>>
>> I'm asking because my last experiments with log -g (from October 2007) 
>> brought complete mergeinfo here when logging the repository root (and 
>> I couldn't find a thread on changing this). I'm using Alpha 2 from 
>> March, 3rd.
> 
> Is this still a problem in beta1?
> 
> -Hyrum
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org