[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SVN 1.5-beta1 svn mergeinfo output for deleted branches

From: Erik Grinaker <erikg_at_codepoet.no>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:43:30 +0700

On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 14:37 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> i have a questions about the behaviour of svn mergeinfo...
>
> I have created branch, merged from that branch and so on....
>
> svn mergeinfo
> Path: .
> Source path: /project1/trunk
> Merged ranges: r1:21
> Eligible ranges: r31:34
> Source path: /project1/branches/B_ENH_F1
> Merged ranges: r2:33
> Eligible ranges:
> Source path: /project1/branches/B_DIFF
> Merged ranges: r21:23
> Eligible ranges: r23:33
>
> Ok so far so god...
>
> But than i deleted the branch B_ENH_F1, cause i completed the work on
> that branch...
>
> svn rm ../project1/branches/B_ENH_F1 -m"- Done."
>
> and now
> svn mergeinfo
> Path: .
> Source path: /project1/trunk
> Merged ranges: r1:21
> Eligible ranges: r31:34
> Source path: /project1/branches/B_ENH_F1
> Merged ranges: r2:33
> Eligible ranges: (source no longer available in HEAD)
> Source path: /project1/branches/B_DIFF
> Merged ranges: r21:23
> Eligible ranges: r23:33
>
> So is it no more best practice to remove the integrated branches or no
> more used branches....cause this will produces many messages if i use
> the merging intensive with many branches...

Yeah, this annoyed me a bit as well. Wouldn't it be better to only
display branches which exist in HEAD by default, and add an option to
display all branches?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-25 07:45:01 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.