Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
> i have taken a look into the discussion...
>
>> These are intended, yes; all of these (implicit dot by default, 'skip'
>> messages, and default depth) were discussed when the changes were made.
>> The changes were committed in r29671 and r29672, following discussions
>> in the following threads:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/97003
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/96711
>>
>>
>> While I wrote some of this code, I won't object to removing it if the
>> concensus is to remove it.
>
> So the result would be to give the people who are working on the book a
> hint, that the described behavior(usage) in the book is not the way SVN
> currently behaves...
Yes, I've fallen behind on tracking the latest evolutions of the changelist
command. I've cc:ed svnbook-dev_at_red-bean.com as a reminder to fix this
soonishly.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2008-03-24 17:43:28 CET