[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Do trivial conflicts in backports require temporary branches?

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:46:44 +0100

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:16:50AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> I'd like to nominate r30004 for backport to 1.4.x.
>
> See here for a 1.4.x user being bitten by the issue:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=76142

Turns out the user didn't hit this particular issue after all.
I was a bit too sloppy reading his problem report.

But I guess we still want the fix in 1.4.7 nonetheless, if
that will ever be released.

-- 
Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>                 Software Developer
elego Software Solutions GmbH                            HRB 77719
Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, Gebaeude 12        Tel:  +49 30 23 45 86 96 
13355 Berlin                              Fax:  +49 30 23 45 86 95
http://www.elego.de                 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Olaf Wagner

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on 2008-03-24 01:46:56 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.