On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should do these items and move on to the RC1 process. If
> you disagree with this, then just please explain why, and even better
> please list the things that you think need to happen to get us to RC1.
> Please be as specific as possible. I will do whatever I can to drum
> up the resources necessary to make these things happen (assuming there
> is consensus they need to be done).
RC implies to me that we can make *no* more substantive changes and
that we as a community feel it is 1.5.0 except for last-minute
thinkos. In my opinion, we're simply not there yet. We need to give
a little more time for feedback from folks before we go off
half-cocked. Perhaps a 'beta' is the next step, but I also think
overloading folks with too frequent releases is a bad thing because
we're creating too much of a moving target. We should let each
release sit for ~2 weeks to give folks a real chance to play with it
rather than constantly spinning out 'alpha1', 'alpha2', etc. So, in
other words, we should be patient and not be overly aggressive. --
justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-08 19:20:13 CET