> Well, my point was that if the code in 1.5.x troubles people we need
> to get those troubles listed and out in the open so that we can
> address them, otherwise we will never release. I think the best way
> to feel comfortable is to have our users use the software and give us
> feedback, and the best way to make that happen is to get to RC1.
Did we get any feedback from the alpha releases? (anywhere? IRC, dev@, users@?)
> > [On a philosophical note, I don't see myself as the guy who dictates
> > /when/ we release, so much as the guy who pushes the button to get the
> > release process rolling when we do decide to do a release (alpha, beta,
> > rc, whatever). I prefer the "when" question be answered by the
> > community. I try not to appear too dictatorial in declaring goals for
> > rolling releases; I'm just helping give people a target to shoot toward
> > for backports.]
>
> I think you are doing great, I do not think anyone thinks you have
> been heavy-handed.
Bye,
Erik.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-07 13:51:15 CET