Re: Feature request: optional `Pristine Copies`
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:53:59PM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> > Thoughts?
> See issue #525: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=525
> The idea of optional text-bases has been around for a while, but there
> hasn't been much work done on it, mainly because the current working
> copy library is such a mess. Several developers are spec'ing out a new
> working copy library, which would have optional text-bases as one of the
> design requirements. Although not available initially, it would make
> implementing such a feature much more easier (and likely).
> Does this match what you are looking for?
Well a lot! It doesn't reflect the explicit commands i proposed for
fetching/purging but there are nice ideas there yes. What i would dislike
is specifying an option explicitly on each command. A single option for
checkout would do enough; or checking out by default without a pristine
working copy. SVN could then report that pieces that are to be worked on
offline need to be processed first with an `svn offline' or the like; the
freshly checked out tree could also then be marked read-only and be
unlocked by the `svn offline' command to prevent accidental modification.
Received on 2008-03-05 22:20:05 CET
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev