[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn log -g problems

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:40:59 -0500

Mark Phippard wrote:
> svn log -g -r29649:29689 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn.1.5/branches/1.5.x
>
> This gives no output at all. Removing the -g works fine. Reversing
> the revision numbers and leaving the -g also works, except there is no
> "-g" output included.

No, reversing the revision numbers does include -g output. See r29671 in
the output below?

$ svn log -r29689:29649 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn.1.5/branches/1.5.x -gq
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29689 | hwright | 2008-03-03 21:15:10 -0500 (Mon, 03 Mar 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29671 | cmpilato | 2008-03-03 11:35:14 -0500 (Mon, 03 Mar 2008)
Merged via: r29689
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29676 | lgo | 2008-03-03 12:42:01 -0500 (Mon, 03 Mar 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29675 | lgo | 2008-03-03 12:38:27 -0500 (Mon, 03 Mar 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29673 | cmpilato | 2008-03-03 11:51:17 -0500 (Mon, 03 Mar 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29670 | cauchy | 2008-03-03 03:40:24 -0500 (Mon, 03 Mar 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29668 | joeswatosh | 2008-03-02 13:25:39 -0500 (Sun, 02 Mar 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29661 | markphip | 2008-03-01 08:38:17 -0500 (Sat, 01 Mar 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29657 | kfogel | 2008-02-29 22:34:48 -0500 (Fri, 29 Feb 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29655 | hwright | 2008-02-29 22:16:47 -0500 (Fri, 29 Feb 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29654 | hwright | 2008-02-29 22:15:19 -0500 (Fri, 29 Feb 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29653 | hwright | 2008-02-29 22:13:59 -0500 (Fri, 29 Feb 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29652 | hwright | 2008-02-29 22:13:03 -0500 (Fri, 29 Feb 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29651 | markphip | 2008-02-29 21:15:51 -0500 (Fri, 29 Feb 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r29649 | kfogel | 2008-02-29 20:38:03 -0500 (Fri, 29 Feb 2008)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$

I notice that there appear to be three merges in the specified range, but
only one of them is a merge of revisions also in the specified range. Is
this reflected in the output above? Meaning, are we only seeing the one -g
revision (r29671) because the other merges are of revisions earlier than r29649?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2008-03-05 02:41:23 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.