Re: What to do about our repository (was: svn.collab.net is now running 1.5.0-alpha2)

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:11 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> wrote:
> > Thoughts? Opinions? Concerns?
>
> (Vote, not veto)
>
> +1 to either #1 or #2. Your call as to which is best.
>
> -1 to #3.
>
> My $.03. =) -- justin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>
>
I'm no regular Subversion developer, but I do use subversion a lot and a
MUCH larger code base at work. Even there checking out and doing a clean
compile is no big deal. It really surprises me you are so against running a
'svn co' command, especially since it seems the repo will be much more
consistent and almost appear as though you've been using 1.5 all along.
Really seems like the most obvious choice. Do you have a bazillion working
copies and so don't want to re-check a whole load of them? Just curious.

Troy

-- 
"Beware of spyware. If you can, use the Firefox browser." - USA Today
Download now at http://getfirefox.com
Registered Linux User #354814 ( http://counter.li.org/)