Re: 1.5.0-alpha1 tarballs up for testing/signing

Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> writes:
> +1 to cmpilato's points about signing of releases being important and
> orthogonal to perfection.
>
> I would say that if a potential "alpha release" suffers from major
> problems that seem to have been recently or accidentally introduced
> and can be fixed in a couple of days, then discard that potential
> release and try again, but if it suffers from major problems that have
> been around for a while and are on the schedule for fixing later, go
> ahead and sign and release it with these problems stated plainly.

Okay. Let's stick with signing, then. It doesn't appear to have been
all that onerous for alpha1 anyway.

Hyrum, are you planning to roll an alpha2 with bindings fixes?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-26 17:38:06 CET