Re: DAV SVN-ACTIONs vs svnserve commands

"David Glasser" <glasser_at_davidglasser.net> writes:

> If somebody adds svnserve logging, it probably makes sense to base the
> logged actions off of the svnserve main command set.
>
> It also probably makes sense to keep the output similar to the DAV
> operational log, which defines its own set of names for actions
> (SVN-ACTION).
>
> epg already made backwards-incompatible changes to the DAV operational
> log format for 1.5. I think we should consider continuing along those
> lines (in 1.5) by eliminating needless differences between these two
> sets of actions names. Here's a summary:

I see this has already gone in (and more! :), but here's a
belated +1 from me.

--
Eric Gillespie <*> epg_at_pretzelnet.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-19 20:15:45 CET