Re: Reality check
From: Steinar Bang <sb_at_dod.no>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:27:36 +0100
>>>>> Branko Èibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>:
> No worries, Mike. This thread's archived, all he has to do is dig back
Well... I haven't seen this thread and others, but I haven't seen you
The tag-and-branch-with-a-copy thing was strange to me, when I first
What I didn't like back in 2001, and what I don't like now, is that it's
Using metadata to say what's what, seems like a simple fix for that
A different world is not what I want from svn. If I want a different
FWIW perforce uses a similar model for branching, and svn's continuity
(not that I like perforce much, though... I have to use it at work)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.