[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Reality check

From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger_at_alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:04:07 +0100

Karl Fogel wrote:
> Steinar Bang <sb_at_dod.no> writes:
>> But one thing I've never understood, is why they are "branches by
>> convention". You guys have a very flexible metadata system, no? So why
>> not put a property on the top dir of a branch or a tag, saying that's
>> what it is?
> We might someday, but we weren't sure (right now) what we'd do with
> that. One of the nice things about a flexible metadata scheme is that
> you don't have to design all your features at once :-).

I've thought that it would make sense to add a property to the trunk
directory that indicates "this is a project root directory" (in the
sense that it is the root of a source code tree, typically the level
that users check out). The property would help scripts orient
themselves. Moreover, it would automatically get propagated when trunk
is copied to make a tag or branch, making it obvious (with no more work)
that *those* are also project root directories.

The point of such a property would mostly be to serve as a line of
demarcation between the project/trunk/tags/branches namespace
interesting in the SCM world and the filename namespace interesting for
working copies, build tools, etc.

If there were a standard convention and name for such a property, then
tool builders might start using it.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-19 10:04:36 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.