[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Reality check

From: Steinar Bang <sb_at_dod.no>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:50:17 +0100

>>>>> Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>:

> I'm all for distinguishing formally between branches and copies, but
> I'm not at all convinced it's problematic to have branches live in the
> directory hierarchy. Kind of the opposite: I've liked it so far!

I agree.

But one thing I've never understood, is why they are "branches by
convention". You guys have a very flexible metadata system, no? So why
not put a property on the top dir of a branch or a tag, saying that's
what it is?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-18 21:53:16 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.