RE: Bug in multipath unlock - fails on unrelated working copy locks
From: Miller, Eric <Eric.Miller_at_amd.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:17:25 -0800
> -----Original Message-----
> I dunno. "L" really only happens if you have concurrent access to the
Not important, lets assume both cases happen.
I guess it is a question of consistency.
The following works:
while this fails:
Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.