Re: Interim proposal for #3048, #3049 (interactive diff / resolution)

On Feb 9, 2008 7:27 PM, Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
> I'd prefer 'm+'/'t+' or even 'mf'/'tf', rather than 'm!'/'t!', because
> in some editors (ahem, Emacs), '!' can be a command (e.g., in
> query-replace) that means "answer yes to all the remaining instances,
> without prompting". That's not the association we want here. I think

But, isn't that *exactly* the connotation that we want? -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-09 19:29:42 CET