Please reconsider this.
Today we are using Apache which is slower and heavier than the
svnserve just because we want to have the ldap authentication (agains
our AD).
I know that patching Cyrrus SASL is better, but have this option
inside svnserve is a good thing for 2 reasons. 1) Is is far simpler
than install Cyrrus SASL specially on Windows. 2) ldap is the standard
authentication mechanism on many companies and many installs are using
apache just to have this.
2008/2/2, Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org>:
> "Ivlev, Eugene" <eivlev_at_esignaldev.com> writes:
>
> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> [...]
>
> Your subject is interesting, but I'm not going to take the effort
> to decipher the body. Next time just send plain text.
>
> I remain -0, close to -1, on this patch. It merely increases our
> maintenance burden, and on a platform that just doesn't get as
> much attention at that. Improving Cyrus SASL on Windows,
> however, helps everyone.
>
> --
> Eric Gillespie <*> epg_at_pretzelnet.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-03 02:20:14 CET