[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Node origins cache rewrite

From: <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:03:28 -0600

"Mark Phippard" <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote on 01/25/2008 09:49:19 AM:
> On Jan 25, 2008 10:45 AM, <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
> > The current physical size on disk of this repo is 9.6GB.
> > (svn 1.4)
> >
> > 190k * 4k = 760MB.
> >
> > So worst case, that would be another 300GB of storage
> > for our ~400 repos. Ugh.
>
> Wow, 400 repositories! You must have quite the SAN.

I'm just glad I didn't have to buy it... :)
(Luckily all of our repos do not have that many revisions, but
 our largest physical repo is ~45GB, so it all averages out.)

> Would using BDB be an option?

Possibly. However, we have been VERY happy with FSFS. I'd
hate to change just for this reason. It would be interesting
to hear why collabnet still uses BDB, but that would
belong in a different thread.

Kevin R.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-25 17:04:45 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.