Re: My understanding of state of things on sqlite storage

On Jan 24, 2008 6:40 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net> wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> >> With this I tend to think we need to do 3 things,
> >>
> >> 1)In trunk Make 'get_mergeinfo_for_tree' API to be sqlite independent.
> >>
> >> 2)In issue-2897 branch make 'get_commit_and_merge_ranges' extract
> >> data from fs rather than from sqlite.
> >
> > 2b) Implement all the other mergeinfo queries for BDB, too.
>
> Thanks for clarifying that, I am working on implementing 2) right now.

That's good to hear. What is your design for doing this efficiently?

The design I've been imagining involves adding a field to noderevs
"predecessor-where-mergeinfo-changed" or something.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org