[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svn commit: r28949 - branches/reintegrate/subversion/tests/cmdline

From: Paul Burba <pburba_at_collab.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:24:45 -0800

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel_at_red-bean.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:01 PM
> To: Paul Burba
> Cc: dev_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r28949 -
> branches/reintegrate/subversion/tests/cmdline
>
> "Paul Burba" <pburba_at_collab.net> writes:
> > (Ignoring the question of r28942's validity for the moment, we can
> > discuss in a different thread or IRC)
> >
> > This test really passes for you? It fails for me (see
> attached log).
> > I think the update needs to come before the copy so
> 'A_COPY/D/G/tauprime'
> > can inherit mergeinfo from 'A_COPY'.
>
> Yes, it really passes for me (over ra_local, same as you
> ran), and it fails without that change. I checked this
> several times, to make sure. (Furthermore, when it failed
> for me, the error was not "Couldn't find node 'tauprime' in
> expected disk tree", as it was for
> you.)
>
> There is some seriously randomizing force at work here... :-(

I rebuilt and tested this morning, and the test passed. I was
completely perplexed until I saw r28964 and the log update to r28949.
So we are all set on this particular question yes?
 
> I wasn't quite sure of the motivations behind r28942. It
> seemed like it would prohibit a lot of mergeinfo inheritance
> that we actually want... I'll start a separate thread on
> that, based on the original commit mail if I still have it.
>
> -Karl
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-21 16:24:59 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.