hwright_at_tigris.org wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Mon Jan 14 15:08:22 2008
> New Revision: 28908
>
> Log:
> Followup to r28902: Get JavaHL building again.
>
> * subversion/bindings/javahl/native/SVNClient.cpp
> (doSwitch, update): Use FALSE for the depth_is_sticky parameter of the
> underlying C API.
This fixes the build, but would it be useful to expose this to the Java API?
> Modified:
> trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native/SVNClient.cpp
>
> Modified: trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native/SVNClient.cpp
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native/SVNClient.cpp?pathrev=28908&r1=28907&r2=28908
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native/SVNClient.cpp (original)
> +++ trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native/SVNClient.cpp Mon Jan 14 15:08:22 2008
> @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@
> SVN_JNI_ERR(svn_client_update3(&revs, array,
> revision.revision(),
> depth,
> + FALSE /* depth_is_sticky */,
> ignoreExternals,
> allowUnverObstructions,
> ctx, requestPool.pool()),
> @@ -545,6 +546,7 @@
> pegRevision.revision(),
> revision.revision(),
> depth,
> + FALSE /* depth_is_sticky */,
> ignoreExternals,
> allowUnverObstructions,
> ctx,
Received on 2008-01-15 00:09:46 CET