I think --set-depth makes more sense than --new-depth. Fuschia.
On Jan 11, 2008 11:42 PM, David Glasser <glasser_at_davidglasser.net> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 8:36 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> > Karl and I have discussed a couple of times this week the weirdness of
> > having --depth be interpreted one way (as a limitation on the scope of an
> > operation) by all but one of our subcommands, and as another way (a way to
> > set a new sticky depth) for 'svn update'. We agreed together that our users
> > would probably be better served by having 'svn update' accept an explicit
> > and unique option, --new-depth, to serve this purpose.
> >
> > This change is a simple one, and I don't recall many folks getting involved
> > in previous discussions about this particular corner of our UI, so I'm
> > planning to just make the change.
> >
> > Respond here if you object and have better ideas. :-)
>
> *Please* do.
>
> --dave
>
>
> --
> David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-12 08:01:39 CET