Re: Finalizing what's in 1.5

"David Glasser" <glasser_at_davidglasser.net> writes:
> (There's no reason not to include both features, by the way; they're
> orthogonal. I just don't want to include issue-2897 at all unless
> several people have been convinced that it actually works well.)

David said exactly what I would have said.

The issue-2897 stuff will be very useful, but it is *not* necessary
for maintaining and merging back feature branches. The --reintegrate
thang will take care of the common case there.

One problem in this discussion is that people have very different
ideas of what the issue-2897 solution would actually *do* in practice.
We need hard facts about the benefits it brings to users (that nothing
else brings). I believe David's summary of what it does, vs what
plain merge does vs what reintegrate does, was accurate, though.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-10 21:46:15 CET