Re: Status on issue-2897 branch

On Dec 13, 2007 12:54 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh@collab.net> wrote:
>
>
> David Glasser wrote:
> > On Dec 12, 2007 11:23 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh@collab.net> wrote:
> >
> >>> (One big question I'm concerned about, looking at that API, is peg-rev
> >>> resolution. What if "merge_target" refers to different, unrelated
> >>> lines of history at min_commit_rev and max_commit_rev?)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Caller subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c filter_reflected_revisions does
> >> a peg rev lookup and calls the API with relevant paths and revisions.
> >>
> >
> > Are you saying it *should* do that or that it does? I don't see that now.
> >
> > --dave
> >
> >
> It does that, revision number and urls are normalized via
> normalize_merge_sources early in the call chain.

First, that should be documented as part of the API.

Secondly, that's just the merge source --- I'm concerned about the merge target.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org