Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> David Anderson wrote:
>>>> On 12/1/07, David Anderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Dave (Anderson), will you be able to RM 1.4.6?
>>>>> [Epic date and mail reading fail]
>>>>> I am able to RM. Stand by, refreshing source code, will get back to you.
>>>> So, my releasing environment still works. I've looked through STATUS
>>>> quickly, but most of it sounds like gibberish for now, I've been away
>>>> for too long. I'll take another look tonight and see if I can add some
>>>> +1s here and there.
>>>> If we want a 1.4.6 release, I invite others to take a few minutes to
>>>> examine changes.
>>> Sounds good. A couple of us have made passes through STATUS over the
>>> past couple of weeks, and it looks like things are starting to
>>> stabilize. (More votes are always, welcomed, of course.)
>>> CHANGES on trunk is up to date with everything that has been merged to
>> Well, it looks like folks have had some time to go through STATUS, and
>> it's pretty clean now. Ready to roll 1.4.6?
> I'm ready to run 2x4-way tests on Windows and/or Linux :)
I'm going to take the liberty of rolling the 1.4.6 tarballs. I'll try
to have them posted for review and testing this evening. (Whereupon
people may proceed to point out mistakes in my distribution environment,
dependency versions, etc.)
Received on Tue Dec 11 23:52:28 2007