[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bug in update -N hoses wc (issue #3039 )

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2007-12-07 11:31:20 CET

"David Glasser" <glasser@davidglasser.net> writes:
>> We should lock all the way down when it's time to delete, I think.
> Oh, and just to make sure: if we're doing an update at a depth that
> should affect a directory A but ordinarily would not affect its
> children (or its non-file children), and we get a delete for A, we
> really should be doing a recursive delete anyway, right?

That's a good question. I guess the answer is yes; you can't make a
directory go away and still have access to stuff underneath it, after
all. (However, it's the usual "remove the tree only if there are no
mods beneath" thing.)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 7 02:31:32 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.