[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 'svn mergeinfo' and renamed branches.

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-11-29 16:55:31 CET

Mark Phippard wrote:
> It would be great if I could give you some rationale behind my answer,
> but not sure I can. I'd prefer the second, concise format. I guess I
> think of it from the perspective of a GUI. I ultimately just want to
> get a set of revisions I can show the user and let them select what
> they want to merge. It is not a lot different than running svn log on
> the path. Basically, it is log with a filter applied. So I'd vote
> for the second, simpler format:
> r19524-r28137: tags/1.4.5

r28139. (My not-so-strong opinion happens to echo yours.)

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on Thu Nov 29 16:55:45 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.