[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r28034 - branches/1.4.x

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: 2007-11-26 23:31:20 CET

glasser@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: glasser
> Date: Mon Nov 26 11:47:33 2007
> New Revision: 28034
>
> Log:
> STATUS: Note that an approved revision conflicts.
>
>
> Modified:
> branches/1.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: branches/1.4.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/branches/1.4.x/STATUS?pathrev=28034&r1=28033&r2=28034
> ==============================================================================
> --- branches/1.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ branches/1.4.x/STATUS Mon Nov 26 11:47:33 2007
> @@ -137,5 +137,8 @@
> Justification:
> WC library bug fix.
> Branch: TBD
> + Notes:
> + glasser tried to merge this but it really conflicts. Can one of
> + the people who voted for it merge it?
> Votes:
> +1: dionisos, dlr, hwright
>

A bit of investigation reveals this change to be dependent on r21596,
which fixes part of issue 2530. We could try to resolve the conflict in
the standard way (i.e., a conflict branch) or we could propose r21596
for backport and make r25833 conditional upon its successful merge.

A cursory review of r21596 leads me to think that it would be a valid
candidate for backport. Garrett, does this sound right?

Thoughts?

-Hyrum

Received on Mon Nov 26 23:31:42 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.