[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Releasing 1.4.6 [was Re: svn commit: r27983 - branches/1.4.x]

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: 2007-11-23 01:34:40 CET

glasser@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: glasser
> Date: Thu Nov 22 14:46:08 2007
> New Revision: 27983
>
> Log:
> STATUS: Yet another reason you should vote for r27256.
>
> Modified:
> branches/1.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: branches/1.4.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/branches/1.4.x/STATUS?pathrev=27983&r1=27982&r2=27983
> ==============================================================================
> --- branches/1.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ branches/1.4.x/STATUS Thu Nov 22 14:46:08 2007
> @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
> from any changes in the txn, they won't commit.
> * I suspect that this is the cause of an FSFS corruption
> observed during performance testing by Dan Christian.
> + * Fixes a serious user-reported corruption problem with
> + commits over mod_dav_svn:
> + http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2007-11/0964.shtml
> Votes:
> +1: glasser, hwright

IIRC, we've had a few data corruption fixes go into 1.4.x since we
released 1.4.4 at the beginning of June (almost 6 months ago!). I would
like to propose a review of STATUS and a release of 1.4.6 by the end of
next week.

Last time we discussed the subject (see
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2007-10/0146.shtml), people wanted to
wait until 1.5 branched. That has been longer in coming than
anticipated, and I think we owe it to our users to get these fixes out
the door. Plus, prepping 1.4.6 would get people's test environments in
shape for 1.5.0-rc1 :)

Would a target date of Nov. 30 be unreasonable?

-Hyrum

Received on Fri Nov 23 01:34:52 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.