--no-interactive-conflicts was Re: Interactively postpone all remaining conflicts?

On Nov 6, 2007 4:52 PM, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> It would be fairly trivial to implement -- we already support runtime
> configuration which gives analogous behavior via:
>
> [miscellany]
> interactive-conflicts = no

Hijacking the thread for a sec, but I'd really be in favor of adding
--no-interactive-conflicts (or something similar) as a long-opt.
(And, I'd probably go so far as to adding this myself if no one
bites...)

Namely because we added --non-interactive to svnmerge.py (in r26883)
because it can't handle conflicts; but doing --non-interactive with an
encrypted SSL client cert means that I have to have my cert password
in my config. That's badness and I'd really like to avoid that when
running svnmerge.py; but when I run the client myself, I *love* this
feature.

WDYT? -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 8 17:12:17 2007