[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Interactively postpone all remaining conflicts?

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2007-11-08 00:31:22 CET

Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> writes:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Karl Fogel wrote:
>> Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> writes:
>> > Until we can more gracefully support the case where a merge conflict
>> > occurs before the final pass of a multi-pass 'merge' operation, I
>> > hesitate to offer this feature for 'merge'. And while it might be
>> > convenient now if we could determine that a merge required only a
>> > single pass (using a callback from the cmdline-client into
>> > libsvn_client), this would result in a UI inconsistency.
>> Given this, I agree -- let's not try for it in 1.5. If people really
>> want it, we'll hear about it, and maybe we'll feel differently about
>> automatic continuation in multi-pass merges even over conflicts by
>> then. (Don't ask me why, we just might.)
> Fine with me. Should an issue be filed so that it's not forgotten?

Could do. But if it's important, we'll hear about it, too, so I
wouldn't worry :-).

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 8 00:31:38 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.