[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revert r23859 - conditionalize skipped sleeping for timestamps on maintainer mode

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2007-11-04 06:54:49 CET

On Nov 3, 2007 10:53 PM, Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:
> "David Glasser" <glasser@davidglasser.net> writes:
> > I do agree about your points about developers not enabling maintainer
> > mode, and about debug-only code paths. I don't think this should be
> > coupled to SVN_DEBUG, but I *do* think it's important that it require
> > a compile-time define (which won't be enabled by binary packagers) to
> > disable it. Maybe something like
> > SVN_UNSAFE_DISABLE_SLEEP_FOR_TIMESTAMPS.
>
> In practical terms, how would that be different from the SVN_DEBUG
> conditionality we have right now?

As I read the email - it'd be the reverse of the situation now. That
is, allow a Debian packager to conditionally *remove* the feature so
their users don't get any bright ideas. But, out of the box, it'd be
available. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 4 06:55:07 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.