RE: Input needed in solving issue 2897.
From: Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-11-03 18:48:40 CET
>+1, and I pledge to review the change(s).
>(I think *theoretically*, we could do it without this schema tweak,
Yes, it would make the code very complex.
>This proposal includes the new API you described in
Yes, but the API is not complete yet so its name/signature would change a lot from what has been described as tentative in the desc20 of issue 2897.
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.