Re: excellent GIT video
From: Talden <talden_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-11-02 01:38:37 CET
I think that Subversion needs to look at SVK very closely and consider
Perhaps a better working copy really should include repository clone.
I certainly don't like the idea of losing the ability to express
-- Talden On 11/2/07, John Peacock <john.peacock@havurah-software.org> wrote: > Greg Hudson wrote: > > A distributed version control system might work very poorly when off the > > net, e.g. if it frequently has to go off and contact other people's > > repostories in order to provide history information. A centralized > > version control system might work very well when off the net, e.g. if > > you keep a cached copy of the whole repository. Two very different axes > > of functionality. > > Except SVK allows me to have a full mirror of the main repo, so it is > not "distributed" in the sense you are using. SVK really is a > disconnected Subversion client and if Subversion grew that capability > natively, I'd be a happy camper because it is a very nice way to work. > > I'm not trying to evangelize about SVK (and I've been using Subversion > longer than I have been using SVK). I am also one of the primary voices > of caution against moving the Perl repo to a Git backend, so I am > automatically biased against Git... ;-) > > John > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Nov 2 01:38:45 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.