Karl Fogel wrote:
>> +
>> +static svn_error_t *
>> +get_version_url(svn_ra_serf__session_t *session,
>> + svn_ra_serf__connection_t *conn,
>> + const char *name,
>> + svn_revnum_t base_revision,
>> + const char *parent_vsn_url,
>> + const char **checked_in_url,
>> + apr_pool_t *pool)
>> +{
>> +
>> + [...]
>
> Heh. Because get_version_url() was moved within the file, as well as
> modified, it's hard to see the diff. I'm not saying you should have
> done things differently -- it had to be moved -- it's just too bad.
>
I noticed. Don't really know how to prevent this though, do you have any
suggestions? Separating in two commits would work, but that seems
overkill for what's basically a 'unified diff readability' issue.
> Unfortunately, ra_serf is not great about documenting its internal
> static functions, but when we're exploding a single parameter ('dir')
> to a bunch of parameters, it would be a real help to document the
> rewritten function...
Agreed.
> I tried it in r27515, please let me know if it reads right to you.
Thanks, looks good. In r27550 I tried to structure it a bit better,
don't know if I succeeded.
Lieven
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 1 14:57:41 2007