On 10/23/07, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, David Glasser wrote:
> > Writing to the wc during --dry-run seems like a bad idea. I'd rather
> > drop dry-run functionality than need to do this. (In fact in the
> > interest of actually finishing this increasingly hairy feature, maybe
> > you should punt --dry-run until later?)
>
> That sounds okay to me, too (I had actually been thinking the same thing).
Ok let's put dry-run back. We can still leave it ON for the
serialized commands though. I'm just going to disable the call to the
external tool when in dry-run mode. How does that sound? (I have to
admit, a bit like a half-baked feature, but this saves some code
refactoring and API changes.)
Charles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 23 20:46:16 2007