Re: Perl Binding Improvement Branch
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, John Peacock wrote:
> Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> > Sounds good. Do you want to re-branch, commit and merge your changes, then
> > re-branch again for Nik's changes?
> Actually, it occurred to me that it might be easier to just produce a patch for
> the changes I've been managing (exporting more API methods to Perl) for direct
> review and commit to trunk, since that doesn't involve any massive
> reorganization. Then I would do the rebranch/reapply Nik's stuff alone, so he
> and I can work on the more revolutionary stuff later. But I can go either way...
The patch approach sounds fine, John.
Received on Mon Oct 22 18:46:26 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev