[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r27292 - in branches/svnpatch-diff/subversion: include libsvn_wc

From: Charles Acknin <charlesacknin_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-10-19 20:56:16 CEST

On 10/19/07, David Glasser <glasser@davidglasser.net> wrote:
> Are you positive that there is no code anywhere that assumes that
> svn_wc_copy2 will fail on ENOENT if the file doesn't exist (and does
> some higher-level recovery)?

I'm not sure I understand correctly this statement. Your question is
about 'code elsewhere that would currently rely on and/or expect
svn_wc_copy2 to fail with ENOENT'? This is hard to answer, that
implies scanning the whole codebase for such a thing. I think the
test-suite is the best tool we have to get a pretty accurate answer on
this matter. (It PASSed before I commit).

[a minute later]

(Just to get an idea of the extent of possible damages: a combination
of find and grep against the source seems to find 73 lines matching
ENOENT among a handful of files. Still, I believe it is a pain to
trace back each error that's being compared against this error code
and see if at anytime svn_wc_copy* was involved.)


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 19 20:56:25 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.