Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On 10/16/07, blair@tigris.org <blair@tigris.org> wrote:
>> Author: blair
>> Date: Tue Oct 16 06:58:40 2007
>> New Revision: 27213
>>
>> Log:
>> Initialized merge tracking via "svnmerge" with revisions "1-27141" from
>> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk
>
> So now you're using svnmerge.py to carefully keep your 'checkpoint' in
> sync with trunk. At this point, how is it any different from a
> feature branch? Is it just the fact that you don't want to write
> structured log messages or have people review the code?
>
> I guess I can understand using /checkpoints as a general anarchy
> dumping-ground to make backups of patches, but this sort of blurs the
> line. Why not just make a feature branch and ask folks not to review
> it yet?
I know, it's turning out that way, not really what I wanted :)
My original intention to using it was to dump the patch somewhere while I worked
out one issue and wrote a real log message, which is my intention to finish this
morning.
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 16 16:15:34 2007