Hi,
>
> I confirmed that you are right. I also did 'svn merge -r8:23
> $R/trunk' and the result was the same, except that the output said
> "Merging r9 through r23 into '.'".
>
> Has there been any discussion or suggestions about allowing the
> specification of relative paths?
In r27191 We fixed the merge-notifications to be more clear. Can you try
with that.
> One of the really nice improvements
> to svnmerge was not having to use full URLs every time. I know that
> the requirements are a little different because with svnmerge you
> always had to 'svnmerge init $URL' first and it could count on having
> a directory property there with all the possibilities. The built-in
> subversion doesn't necessarily have that luxury. But perhaps some
> kind of notification that represents the root URL of the current
> working copy?
>
>
In fact merge source url can be optional(if invoked with -g), it
defaults to copy source of the target if one exists or the first merge
source from its (svn:mergeinfo).
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 16 14:08:58 2007