Re: svn checkpoint: r27139 - checkpoints

On Oct 13, 2007 12:55 AM, Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:
> How about: "anything you would have formerly attached to an issue as a
> patch", for starters? Now we can just say a revision number instead.

But, then, it's impossible to review it via email because we don't have diffs.

All I'm suggesting is that we turn back on diffs and socially tell
folks, "don't be a turd" about giving nit-pick comments to anything in
/checkpoints. Yet, if the intent of /checkpoints is that
occassionally folks will be asked to look in it, then that implies we
need easy ways to review what is there. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 13 18:13:09 2007