[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Issue 2959] [sparse-directories] depth upgrade against old servers is broken

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2007-10-13 09:33:23 CEST

"David Glasser" <glasser@davidglasser.net> writes:
> While the exact solution to this particular situation could go a
> different way, having general RA capability support is very exciting.
> I can't count the number of times I've gone through the whole "we
> could implement it this way, but there's no way for the client to know
> if the server supports it, and it's easy to check with svnserve but a
> pain with DAV" rigmarole...

Oh, I think we all agree the new RA functionality should stay. The
question is whether we also add something to the reporter vtable so
that svn_wc_crawl_revisions3() can get this answer directly, without
having to be passed it by various svn_client_foo() functions.

I'd like to sleep on it. Er, and, well, fly to Munich on it too, I
guess, since that's the next thing after sleep for me :-).

Vlad, I'll commit my patch as it is for now, since almost all of it
would stand no matter what we decide. Your proposed additional
changes can be made easily at any time (and we're clearly not
branching tonight, sigh). Let's let this question sit in our brains
for a bit and then see.

-Karl, tired from fighting RA layers all day

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 13 09:33:34 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.